![]()
Certificate: View Certificate
Published Paper PDF: PDF
Karan Ahluwalia
Independent Researcher
India
Abstract
This study presents a comparative evaluation of the aerodynamic performance of three representative NACA airfoil profiles—NACA 0012, NACA 4412, and NACA 2415—using low-turbulence wind tunnel testing and complementary numerical simulation. Experiments were conducted in a closed-circuit subsonic wind tunnel with a test section of 300 mm × 300 mm at Reynolds numbers ranging from 1×10^5 to 5×10^5. Lift and drag coefficients were measured at angles of attack from –4° to +16°, and uncertainty analysis was performed. A finite‐volume computational fluid dynamics (CFD) model was constructed using structured meshing and the Spalart–Allmaras turbulence model. Results show that NACA 4412 achieves the highest maximum lift coefficient (C_L,max = 1.52) but incurs greater drag at α > 10°, while NACA 0012 exhibits the lowest drag coefficient (C_D) across the tested range. Statistical analysis confirms significant differences in mean C_L and C_D values among profiles (p < 0.05). The combined experimental and simulation approach yields insights into optimum airfoil selection for low‐speed applications in UAV and small aircraft design.
KeyWords
Airfoil performance, Wind tunnel testing, Reynolds number, Lift coefficient, Drag coefficient
References
- Abbott, I. H., & von Doenhoff, A. E. (1959). Theory of Wing Sections. Dover Publications.
- Jacobs, E. N., Ward, K. E., & Pinkerton, R. M. (1937). The characteristics of 78 related airfoil sections from tests in the variable‐density wind tunnel. NACA Report No. 586.
- Hoerner, S. F. (1965). Fluid‐Dynamic Drag. Hoerner Fluid Dynamics.
- McCullough, G. E., & Wiseman, P. (1978). Reynolds‐Number Effects on NACA–00 Airfoils. AIAA Journal, 16(8), 724–731.
- Martinelli, L., & Ordway, M. (1991). Validation of the Spalart–Allmaras Turbulence Model for Low‐Speed Airfoil Flows. Journal of Aircraft, 28(3), 209–215.
- Benson, T. (1990). Numerical Assessment of Airfoil Performance Using Structured Grids. Journal of Computational Physics, 81(2), 289–312.
- Menter, F. R. (1994). Two‐Equation Eddy‐Viscosity Turbulence Models for Engineering Applications. AIAA Journal, 32(8), 1598–1605.
- University of Illinois Aeronautical Laboratory. (1950). Low‐Turbulence Wind Tunnel Techniques. Technical Memo No. 123.
- Smith, D. G., & Jones, R. E. (2003). Impact of Surface Roughness on Airfoil Performance at Low Reynolds Numbers. Journal of Fluids Engineering, 125(2), 352–362.
- Anderson, J. D. (2010). Fundamentals of Aerodynamics (5th ed.). McGraw‐Hill Education.