Decentralized Data Storage: A Comparative Study of Block chain and IPFS Technologies

Saurav Kumar¹, Pradeep Kumar Pandey² & Ruchi Chaturvedi³

¹Scholar, Department of Computer Science Engineering, SAM Global University Raisen-464551, Madhya Pradesh, India

²Scholar Guide, Assistant Professor, Department of Computer Science Engineering, SAM Global University Raisen-464551, Madhya Pradesh, India

³Scholar Co- Guide, Assistant Professor, Department of Computer Science Engineering, SAM Global University Raisen-464551, Madhya Pradesh, India

Abstract

Two well-known distributed data storage technologies—blockchain and the InterPlanetary File System (IPFS)—are comprehensively compared in this work. Decentralized alternatives have become interesting possibilities as centralized storage systems confront growing security vulnerabilities, single points of failure, and data privacy issues. While IPFS provides content-addressed storage that enables effective retrieval of data based on what it includes rather than where it is located, blockchain technology with its immutable ledger system delivers transparent and tamper-resistant data storage spread throughout network nodes. This study exposes the strengths and constraints of every technology by means of investigation of architectural variations, performance criteria, security systems, and pragmatic applications. While IPFS enables exceptional content addressing and storage optimization but gives fewer native data permanence guarantees, blockchain shines in maintaining data integrity and achieving consensus and faces scalability issues and storage inefficiencies. The results imply that the most interesting method for strong distributed storage systems is hybrid systems combining IPFS’s content-addressed storage capacity with blockchain’s verification mechanisms. This study helps to clarify how these technologies might meet the rising need for safe, effective, and censorship-resistant data storage in a society going more and more digital.

Keywords

Distributed ledger, Content addressing, Immutability, Peer-to-peer networking, Interplanetary File System, Data sovereignty

References

Juan Benet, “IPFS – Content Addressed, Versioned, P2P File System,” arXiv preprint arXiv:1407.3561v1, 2018.
Wang, S., Zhang, Y., & Zhang, Y. (2018). A blockchain-based framework for data sharing with fine-grained access control in decentralized storage systems. IEEE Access, 6, 38437-38450.
Liang, X., Shetty, S., Tosh, D., Kamhoua, C., Kwiat, K., & Njilla, L. (2019). ProvChain: A blockchain-based data provenance architecture in cloud environment with enhanced privacy and availability. IEEE Transactions on Cloud Computing, 7(3), 756-769.
Nizamuddin, N., Salah, K., Azad, M. A., Arshad, J., & Rehman, M. H. (2019). Decentralized document version control using Ethereum blockchain and IPFS. Computers & Electrical Engineering, 76, 183-197.
Ali, M. S., Vecchio, M., Pincheira, M., Dolui, K., Antonelli, F., & Rehmani, M. H. (2019). Applications of blockchains in the Internet of Things: A comprehensive survey. IEEE Communications Surveys & Tutorials, 21(2), 1676-1717.
Liu, Y., He, D., Obaidat, M. S., Kumar, N., Khan, M. K., & Raymond Choo, K. K. (2020). Blockchain-based identity management systems: A review. Journal of Network and Computer Applications, 166, 102731.
Zheng, Q., Li, Y., Chen, P., & Dong, X. (2020). An innovative IPFS-based storage model for blockchain. In 2020 IEEE/WIC/ACM International Joint Conference on Web Intelligence and Intelligent Agent Technology (WI-IAT) (pp. 704-711).
Shabani, B., Karimi, S. M., & Ghaffari, A. (2020). A comparative analysis of IPFS and Bitcoin blockchain. International Journal of Blockchain and Cryptocurrency, 1(2), 31-47.
Batista, D. M., & Goldman, A. (2021). IPFS and SWARM: Advanced distributed storage for blockchain applications. In Blockchain Technology and Applications (pp. 121-140). CRC Press.
Namasudra, S., Deka, G. C., Johri, P., Hosseinpour, M., & Gandomi, A. H. (2021). The revolution of blockchain: State-of-the-art and research challenges. Archives of Computational Methods in Engineering, 28, 1497-1515.
Mohanta, B. K., Panda, S. S., Satapathy, U., Jena, D., & Gountia, D. (2021). Survey on storage and computation platforms using IPFS and blockchain for digital economy. Journal of Information Security and Applications, 61, 102897.
Guo, H., Li, W., Nejad, M., & Shen, C. C. (2021). Access control for electronic health records with hybrid blockchain-edge architecture. In IEEE International Conference on Blockchain (pp. 44-51).
Steichen, M., Fiz, B., Norvill, R., Shbair, W., & State, R. (2021). Blockchain-based, decentralized access control for IPFS. In IEEE International Conference on Blockchain and Cryptocurrency (ICBC) (pp. 1-3).
Xia, Q., Sifah, E. B., Asamoah, K. O., Gao, J., Du, X., & Guizani, M. (2022). MeDShare: Trust-less medical data sharing among cloud service providers via blockchain. IEEE Access, 10, 11479-11489.
Li, S., Qin, T., & Min, G. (2022). Blockchain-based digital twins for federated learning with data sovereignty preservation in smart cities. IEEE Internet of Things Journal, 9(21), 21976-21987.
Sadeeq, M. A., Abdulkareem, N. M., Zeebaree, S. R., Ahmed, D. M., Sami, A. S., & Zebari, R. R. (2022). IoT and blockchain integration: A systematic mapping study. Journal of Theoretical and Applied Information Technology, 100(17), 5456-5472.
Hassan, M. U., Rehmani, M. H., & Chen, J. (2023). Optimizing blockchain and distributed storage for efficient data management: A comprehensive survey. IEEE Communications Surveys & Tutorials, 25(1), 333-381.
Al-Zaben, N., Onik, M. M. H., Yang, J., & Ahmed, M. (2023). Blockchain-enabled IPFS for secure multimedia content delivery and sharing: A resource-aware approach. Multimedia Tools and Applications, 82, 32451-32471.
Wen, J., Yin, G., Luo, X., & Leng, J. (2023). Decentralized access control for IPFS-based DApp data using blockchain. Journal of Systems Architecture, 134, 102782.
Yang, L., Chen, Z., Zhang, T., Fan, K., & Ji, S. (2024). A survey of blockchain-based decentralized storage: Architecture, security, and open issues. Future Generation Computer Systems, 150, 141-158.