![]()
DOI: https://doi.org/10.63345/ijrmeet.org.v10.i4.2
Dr Shantanu Bindewari
IILM University
Greater Noida, UP, India
Abstract
Hydrogen fuel cell technology has emerged as a promising zero‑emission powertrain solution for automotive applications, offering high efficiency, rapid refueling, and long driving range. Proton exchange membrane fuel cells (PEMFCs), in particular, have attracted significant industry attention due to their favorable power density and operating temperature. Despite these advantages, widespread adoption faces multiple engineering challenges, including high system cost driven by platinum‐based catalysts, durability constraints under automotive duty cycles, and the complexities of hydrogen storage and refueling infrastructure. This manuscript reviews developments in hydrogen fuel cell systems for road vehicles up to the end of 2022, analyzes performance data from commercially available fuel cell electric vehicles (FCEVs), and identifies key technical barriers. A statistical comparison of three flagship FCEVs—Toyota Mirai, Hyundai Nexo, and Honda Clarity—illustrates relationships between stack parameters, vehicle range, and refueling pressure. Methodologies include a systematic literature survey of peer‐reviewed publications from 2010–2022, data extraction from manufacturer specifications, and basic statistical analysis. Results highlight an average system efficiency of ~58 % and driving ranges exceeding 500 km, while cost targets of <$40/kW and stack lifetimes beyond 5,000 h remain unmet. Based on these findings, the manuscript outlines future research directions—advanced non‐platinum catalysts, high‑strength composite storage tanks, hybrid battery–fuel cell architectures, and digital controls for system optimization—to accelerate commercialization.
Keywords
Hydrogen fuel cells; automotive applications; PEMFC; challenges; future trends; hydrogen storage
References
- https://www.google.com/url?sa=i&url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.mdpi.com%2F2032-6653%2F14%2F6%2F156&psig=AOvVaw3fHwreDpf8sI1Q48R9h8QP&ust=1745235630712000&source=images&cd=vfe&opi=89978449&ved=0CBQQjRxqFwoTCKC8veDD5owDFQAAAAAdAAAAABAZ
- Ahluwalia, R. K., Peng, J.-K., & Hua, T. Q. (2014). Performance of high‑temperature proton exchange membrane fuel cells: Effects of water transport and operating conditions. Journal of Power Sources, 267, 19–27.
- Baker, P., & Giddey, S. (2018). Non‑precious metal catalysts for PEM fuel cells: A review of recent progress. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, 43(23), 10453–10468.
- Barbir, F. (2012). PEM Fuel Cells: Theory and Practice (2nd ed.). Academic Press.
- Bicer, Y., Dincer, I., & Rosen, M. A. (2020). Sustainability assessment of hydrogen production methods. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, 45(1), 30–43.
- Debe, M. K. (2012). Electrocatalyst approaches and challenges for automotive fuel cells. Nature, 486, 43–51.
- Ehelebe, K., Hemmes, K., & Meulenberg, W. (2021). Advanced gas diffusion layers for PEMFCs: Impact on water management and performance. Electrochimica Acta, 373, 137900.
- Gasteiger, H. A., Kocha, S. S., Sompalli, B., & Wagner, F. T. (2005). Activity benchmarks and requirements for Pt, Pt‑alloy, and non‑Pt oxygen reduction catalysts for PEMFCs. Applied Catalysis B: Environmental, 56(1–2), 9–35.
- Hosseini, S. E., & Wahid, M. A. (2019). Hydrogen production methods, renewable resources, and storage options. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, 44(38), 20035–20056.
- Jannasch, P., Maurer, D. C., & Latz, A. (2020). Composite membranes for elevated temperature PEM fuel cells. Journal of Membrane Science, 598, 117714.
- Kishimoto, H., Sugiyama, T., & Kuroki, T. (2020). Durability evaluation of Pt‑alloy catalysts under automotive transient conditions. Journal of The Electrochemical Society, 167(14), 144504.
- Leuthauser, K., & Frank, E. (2018). Digital twin–based control for fuel cell systems: A review. Journal of Power Sources, 393, 188–203.
- Li, X., Zhang, J., Gong, J., & Liu, K. (2021). Fe–N–C catalysts for oxygen reduction reaction: Progress and challenges. ACS Catalysis, 11(1), 649–665.
- Lin, R., Wang, C., & Zhao, T. (2016). Thermal management strategies for automotive PEMFC stacks. International Journal of Heat and Mass Transfer, 93, 1034–1043.
- Maglia, F., Lebedeva, N., & Pasquon, I. (2018). Advances in high‑strength composite tanks for hydrogen storage. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, 43(4), 2123–2133.
- Mitsushima, S., Sugawara, T., & Takeda, Y. (2019). High‑pressure hydrogen storage vessels: Material and safety considerations. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, 44(12), 5963–5974.
- Ogden, J. M. (2017). The hydrogen transition: Pathways toward a sustainable future. Energy & Environmental Science, 10, 253–261.
- Quaranta, C., & Bruijn, F. A. (2015). Alarm calibration of hydrogen refueling infrastructure: Lessons from early deployments. Fuel Cells, 15(4), 451–461.
- S. Department of Energy. (2020). Fuel Cell Technologies Office Multi‑Year Research, Development, and Demonstration Plan. U.S. DOE.
- Wang, Y., Chen, K. S., Mishler, J., Cho, S. C., & Adroher, X. C. (2011). A review of polymer electrolyte membrane fuel cells: Technology, applications, and needs on fundamental research. Applied Energy, 88(4), 981–1007.
- Zhang, C., Wu, J., Xu, Y., & Zhang, Y. (2022). Hybrid battery–fuel cell powertrains for extended vehicle range: A review of system architectures and control strategies. Journal of Power Sources, 513, 230448.