![]()
DOI: https://doi.org/10.63345/ijrmeet.org.v10.i11.3
Vikhyat Gupta
Punjab, India
Abstract
Supply chains today face critical challenges in ensuring transparency, traceability, and trust among distributed stakeholders. This study investigates the integration of blockchain technology into supply chain management (SCM) to enhance transparency and reduce inefficiencies. We conducted a systematic literature review of blockchain-based SCM solutions up to 2022, developed a conceptual framework for integration, and implemented a prototype on Hyperledger Fabric (v1.4) and the Ethereum (Rinkeby) testnet. Performance metrics—throughput, latency, and transaction cost—were measured under varying loads. Additionally, a stakeholder survey (n = 20) assessed perceived improvements in transparency and trust. Results indicate that permissioned architectures (Hyperledger Fabric) achieved higher throughput (up to 350 TPS) and lower latency (average 250 ms) compared to permissionless networks (Ethereum: 15 TPS, 1.5 s latency). Survey responses revealed a 30% increase in perceived auditability and a 25% reduction in dispute resolution time. Key challenges include scalability limits, data privacy concerns, and governance models. Our findings demonstrate that blockchain integration can materially improve SCM transparency, though real‑world adoption requires addressing performance, interoperability, and regulatory compliance issues. Beyond these core findings, this research contributes novel insights into the alignment of blockchain architectural choices with specific supply chain stages—procurement, manufacturing, distribution, and after‑sales service. We elaborate on transaction orchestration patterns that minimize cross‑organizational data leakage while preserving audit trails. To address GDPR‑style privacy requirements, we explore hybrid on‑chain/off‑chain data storage strategies and selective encryption of sensitive fields. Furthermore, our extended prototype analysis examines the trade‑off between consensus finality and operational throughput, demonstrating that tuning endorsement policies can yield up to a 15% improvement in Fabric network performance without compromising security. We also integrate a permission‑level registry service to manage stakeholder access, highlighting how dynamic membership models impact governance overhead. Finally, we discuss implications for regulatory compliance, proposing a framework for periodic smart contract audits and real‑time compliance reporting. Collectively, these extensions reinforce the viability of blockchain‑enabled SCM as a transformative approach for industries requiring high degrees of transparency and accountability.
Keywords
Blockchain, Supply Chain Management, Transparency, Smart Contracts, Hyperledger Fabric
References
- https://www.google.com/url?sa=i&url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.turing.com%2Fresources%2Fblockchain-for-supply-chains&psig=AOvVaw0i-lyrJQheZKfMvZ0Iquxz&ust=1745156707690000&source=images&cd=vfe&opi=89978449&ved=0CBUQjRxqFwoTCLjM9vKg5IwDFQAAAAAdAAAAABAE
- https://www.google.com/url?sa=i&url=https%3A%2F%2Fappinventiv.com%2Fblog%2Fblockchain-in-supply-chain%2F&psig=AOvVaw0i-lyrJQheZKfMvZ0Iquxz&ust=1745156707690000&source=images&cd=vfe&opi=89978449&ved=0CBUQjRxqFwoTCLjM9vKg5IwDFQAAAAAdAAAAABAR
- Adams, R., Brown, T., & Clark, S. (2021). Evaluating performance trade‑offs in permissioned and permissionless blockchains. Journal of Distributed Systems, 15(2), 112–129.
- Androulaki, E., Barger, A., Bortnikov, V., Cachin, C., Christidis, K., De Caro, A., … & Yellick, J. (2018). Hyperledger Fabric: A distributed operating system for permissioned blockchains. Proceedings of the Thirteenth EuroSys Conference, 30. https://doi.org/10.1145/3190508.3190538
- Behnke, K., & Janssen, M. (2020). Boundary conditions for traceability in food supply chains using blockchain technology. International Journal of Information Management, 52, 101969. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2019.05.025
- Christidis, K., & Devetsikiotis, M. (2016). Blockchains and smart contracts for the Internet of Things. IEEE Access, 4, 2292–2303. https://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2016.2566339
- Feng, L., Zhang, J., & Li, Y. (2021). Privacy‑preserving mechanisms for supply chain blockchain applications. Computers & Security, 102, 102133. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cose.2020.102133
- Francisco, K., & Swanson, D. (2018). The supply chain has no clothes: Technology adoption of blockchain for supply chain transparency. Logistics, 2(1), 2. https://doi.org/10.3390/logistics2010002
- Kamble, S. S., Gunasekaran, A., & Sharma, R. (2018). Analysis of the driving and dependency powers of barriers to adopt blockchain in sustainable supply chain management. International Journal of Production Research, 57(7), 2194–2211. https://doi.org/10.1080/00207543.2018.1533263
- Kitchenham, B. (2004). Procedures for performing systematic reviews. Keele, UK, Keele University, 33(2004), 1–26.
Kshetri, N. (2018). 1 Blockchain’s roles in meeting key supply chain management objectives. International Journal of Information Management, 39, 80–89. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2017.12.005 - Kouhizadeh, M., Sarkis, J., & Zhu, Q. (2021). Blockchain technology and the sustainable supply chain: Theoretically exploring adoption barriers. International Journal of Production Economics, 231, 107831. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpe.2020.107831
- Min, H. (2019). Blockchain technology for enhancing supply chain resilience. Business Horizons, 62(1), 35–45. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bushor.2018.08.004
- Nakamoto, S. (2008). Bitcoin: A peer‑to‑peer electronic cash system. Retrieved from https://bitcoin.org/bitcoin.pdf
Pereira, R., Franco, J., & Mello, C. (2022). Assessing blockchain‑enabled supply chains: A framework for performance measurement. Supply Chain Management Review, 28(4), 18–25. - Reyna, A., Martín, C., Chen, J., Soler, E., & Díaz, M. (2018). On blockchain and its integration with IoT. Challenges and opportunities. Future Generation Computer Systems, 88, 173–190. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.future.2018.05.046
- Saberi, S., Kouhizadeh, M., Sarkis, J., & Shen, L. (2019). Blockchain technology and its relationships to sustainable supply chain management. International Journal of Production Research, 57(7), 2117–2135. https://doi.org/10.1080/00207543.2018.1533261
- Tian, F. (2016). An agri‑food supply chain traceability system for China based on RFID & blockchain technology. 13th International Conference on Service Systems and Service Management, 1–6. https://doi.org/10.1109/ICSSSM.2016.7558424
- Wamba, S. F., Queiroz, M. M., Kim, H., & Akter, S. (2020). Blockchain adoption challenges in supply chain: An empirical investigation of the main drivers in India. International Journal of Production Research, 58(7), 2063–2084. https://doi.org/10.1080/00207543.2019.1646518
- Wang, Z., Zhao, L., & Sun, L. (2019). A performance evaluation of Hyperledger Fabric platforms. Journal of Software: Evolution and Process, 31(11), e2184. https://doi.org/10.1002/smr.2184
- Xu, X., Weber, I., & Staples, M. (2020). Architecture for blockchain applications. Springer.
Yadav, A., & Singh, A. (2019). Blockchain in supply chain management: A review of structures, applications, and challenges. International Journal of Recent Technology and Engineering, 8(2), 359–364.