Sandeep Keshetti1 & Dr. Saurabh Solanki2
1University of Missouri-Kansas City
5000 Holmes St, Kansas City, MO 64110, United States
2Aviktechnosoft Private Limited
Govind Nagar, Mathura, UP, India, PIn-281001
Abstract– Configuration management (CM) is now an essential component of the scalable systems of today, particularly when organizations are seeking to accelerate deployment processes and reduce development effort. Evolution in DevOps practices, cloud-native environments, and automation tools has revolutionized configuration management in different ecosystems. However, with these advancements, there are still issues such as configuration drift, management of a single cloud, multiple clouds with compatibility, as well as manual intervention in complex environments. While Infrastructure as Code (IaC) and GitOps have significantly improved the automation of updating configurations, the need for predictive and real-time management solutions is largely in a state of incompleteness. This paper seeks to bridge the research gap that exists by exploring the recent advancements, such as the use of artificial intelligence and machine learning (AI/ML) for predictive configuration management, the role of blockchain technology in integrity and transparency, and the use of cloud management platforms for centralized configuration management. While various studies focus on the newest technologies for automating specific aspects of configuration management, few explore the integration of these new technologies into an end-to-end, holistic solution which can dynamically adapt to the evolving demands of scalable systems. Moreover, little research explores the possibility of service meshes and container orchestration in simplifying the hassle of configuration management in large-scale distributed systems. The research highlights the benefit of integrating AI-driven models, automation tools, and decentralized technologies to improve configuration management processes. This approach not only accelerates deployment but also increases system stability and scalability. Addressing the gaps in the current research body, this study brings new insights into how modern configuration management tools reduce the need for manual intervention, increase automation, and facilitate faster, more efficient deployment in scalable systems.
Keywords– Configuration management, DevOps, Infrastructure as Code, GitOps, automation, scalability, deployment acceleration, AI/ML, predictive configuration, configuration drift, service meshes, cloud-native platforms, container orchestration, blockchain, multi-cloud compatibility, continuous delivery, real-time configuration, automated testing, cloud management platforms, microservices architecture.
References
- Chen, L., et al. (2016). DevOps and Continuous Integration/Continuous Delivery in Large-Scale Systems. International Journal of Software Engineering and Applications, 7(5), 1-12.
- Mauer, M., et al. (2017). Infrastructure as Code: Best Practices for Managing Cloud Infrastructure with Automation. IEEE Cloud Computing, 4(2), 28-37.
- Voutilainen, A., et al. (2018). Containerization and Microservices: Optimizing Configuration Management for Scalable Systems. Proceedings of the 20th International Conference on Cloud Computing, 35-40.
- Galli, F., et al. (2021). Cloud-Native Configuration Management: Leveraging Kubernetes and Helm for Scalable Systems. Journal of Cloud Computing: Advances, Systems, and Applications, 9(1), 1-15.
- Barbosa, L., et al. (2020). Automating Configuration Drift Detection in Cloud Environments. International Journal of Cloud Computing and Services Science, 9(2), 63-73.
- Tan, Y., et al. (2023). AI-Based Predictive Configuration Management for Scalable Systems. IEEE Transactions on Automation Science and Engineering, 20(3), 251-262.
- Huang, Q., et al. (2023). Service Meshes for Microservices Configuration Management: A New Paradigm. ACM Computing Surveys, 55(4), 56-72.
- Johnson, C., et al. (2019). Using Blockchain for Ensuring Configuration Integrity in Cloud Systems. International Journal of Information Security, 18(6), 479-489.
- Vasilenko, R., et al. (2020). Serverless Computing and Its Impact on Configuration Management. Journal of Cloud Computing Research, 7(1), 25-40.
- García, M., et al. (2017). Automated Configuration Validation and Testing in DevOps Pipelines. Software Quality Journal, 25(3), 541-559.
- Santos, M., et al. (2019). Dynamic Environment Provisioning for Efficient Configuration Management in Cloud Systems. Proceedings of the 2019 International Conference on Cloud Computing Technology, 49-58.
- Nayak, M., et al. (2021). GitOps for Simplified Configuration Management in Kubernetes Environments. Cloud Computing & Services, 8(2), 75-88.
- Li, X., et al. (2020). Machine Learning for Real-Time Configuration Drift Detection in Large-Scale Systems. Journal of Computing and Information Science, 16(4), 221-233.
- Zhang, Y., et al. (2018). Cloud Management Platforms for Streamlining Configuration in Multi-Cloud Environments. IEEE Transactions on Cloud Computing, 6(5), 1841-1852.
- Peterson, T., et al. (2019). Continuous Configuration Automation: Enhancing CI/CD with Infrastructure as Code. Journal of Cloud Computing and Systems Administration, 12(2), 105-115.
- Koh, S., et al. (2020). Real-Time Configuration Updates in Microservices with Kubernetes. Journal of Cloud Computing: Systems, Applications & Services, 13(1), 34-47.
- Liu, D., et al. (2018). Collaborative Configuration Management for Distributed Teams: A GitOps Approach. Proceedings of the 2018 International Conference on Software Engineering, 1325-1336.
- Zhao, F., et al. (2023). Configuring Large-Scale Kubernetes Clusters: Challenges and Best Practices. Journal of Cloud Infrastructure and Automation, 11(4), 203-215.
- Singh, A., et al. (2021). Agile Configuration Management in Cloud-Native Systems. International Journal of Software Engineering, 18(2), 118-130.