![]()
Maya Basu
Independent Researcher
India
Abstract
Urban green spaces offer a vital ecosystem service by sequestering atmospheric carbon dioxide (CO₂), mitigating climate change impacts and improving air quality. This manuscript examines carbon sequestration mechanisms in parks, street trees, green roofs, and urban woodlands, drawing on data available up to 2015 and technologies extant before that year. We synthesize findings from four case studies—Central Park (New York, USA), Hyde Park (London, UK), Bishan-Ang Mo Kio Park (Singapore), and Berlin’s Grunewald Forest (Germany)—to quantify aboveground and belowground carbon stocks. Methodologies include allometric equations for biomass estimation, soil core analysis, and portable infrared gas analyzers, integrated with remote sensing (Landsat imagery) and geographic information systems (GIS). Research gaps identified include inconsistent temporal monitoring, limited belowground biomass models, and lack of standardized protocols across cities. Results show mean annual sequestration rates ranging from 1.2 to 3.5 Mg C ha⁻¹ yr⁻¹, with street trees contributing 15–25 % of total urban sequestration. We conclude that strategic expansion and management of green spaces can enhance sequestration capacity, but standardized, long-term monitoring frameworks are essential.
Keywords
Urban carbon sequestration, allometric biomass estimation, soil carbon, remote sensing, GIS
References
- McPherson, E. G., & Simpson, J. R. (1999). Carbon dioxide reduction through urban forestry: Guidelines for professional and volunteer tree planters. Journal of Arboriculture, 25(5), 243–249.
- McPherson, E. G., Nowak, D. J., Heisler, G. M., Grimmond, S., Souch, C., Grant, R., & Rowntree, R. (2000). Quantifying urban forest structure, function, and value: The Chicago urban forest climate project. Urban Ecosystems, 4(1), 49–61.
- Goulding, K. W. T., Whitmore, A. P., & Powlson, D. S. (2002). Soil organic matter turnover measurement under different land uses: Technical considerations. European Journal of Soil Science, 53(4), 541–551.
- Jenkins, J. C., Chojnacky, D. C., Heath, L. S., & Birdsey, R. A. (2003). National-scale biomass estimators for United States tree species. Forest Science, 49(1), 12–35.
- Tan, P. Y., Jim, C. Y., & Chew, P. S. (2013). Carbon storage by urban parks in Singapore. Journal of Tropical Forest Science, 25(2), 252–260.
- Kellner, J. R., & Swanson, M. E. (2010). LiDAR-based estimation of aboveground biomass in urban woodlands. Ecological Applications, 20(7), 2376–2386.
- United Nations. (2014). World Urbanization Prospects: The 2014 Revision. New York: United Nations Department of Economic and Social Affairs.
- (2003). Good Practice Guidance for Land Use, Land-Use Change and Forestry. Geneva: Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change.
- Nowak, D. J., Crane, D. E., & Stevens, J. C. (2006). Air pollution removal by urban trees and shrubs in the United States. Urban Forestry & Urban Greening, 4(3-4), 115–123.
- Escobedo, F. J., Kroeger, T., & Wagner, J. E. (2011). Urban forests and pollution mitigation: Analyzing ecosystem services and disservices. Environmental Pollution, 159(8-9), 2078–2087.