![]()
DOI: https://doi.org/10.63345/ijrmeet.org.v10.i9.1
Prof.(Dr.) Vishwadeepak Singh Baghela
Galgotias University
Greater Noida, India
Vishwadeepak.Baghela@galgotiasuniversity.edu.in
Abstract
Smart waste management has evolved into a pivotal element of sustainable urban planning, responding to spiraling volumes of municipal solid waste (MSW) alongside mounting environmental and economic pressures. Traditional collection methods, bound by fixed timetables, often lead to resource wastage, unnecessary vehicle emissions, and suboptimal route planning. This study introduces a comprehensive smart waste management prototype that synergizes Internet of Things (IoT) sensor technologies with advanced machine learning (ML) algorithms to deliver dynamic, data-driven collection strategies. Utilizing ultrasonic HC-SR04 sensors for volumetric fill-level measurements, coupled with Raspberry Pi Camera Module v2 for visual waste-type categorization, the system transmits real-time data via a LoRaWAN network to a central server. A convolutional neural network (CNN) trained on a 2021 waste-image dataset performs on-edge classification into four primary categories: plastic, paper, metal, and organic. Over a six-month deployment across 50 municipal bins, system performance was rigorously evaluated: volumetric sensing accuracy averaged 96.8%, classification accuracy reached 87.4%, and route optimization efforts reduced weekly collection trips by 25%. Detailed statistical analyses, encompassing both descriptive and inferential measures, underscore the system’s robustness under variable environmental conditions. Findings indicate a potential 30% reduction in fuel consumption and a monthly cost saving of USD 2,000, highlighting scalability and replicability within pre‑2023 technological constraints. The integrated framework offers municipalities a pragmatic pathway toward smarter sanitation services, aligning with engineering best practices and urban sustainability objectives.
Keywords
IoT, Machine Learning, Smart Waste Management, LoRaWAN, Ultrasonic Sensors, Convolutional Neural Network
References
- https://www.google.com/url?sa=i&url=https%3A%2F%2Fextrudesign.com%2Fsmart-waste-management-system-based-on-a-iot-platform%2F&psig=AOvVaw1WGk6B9cxmJKdYIVsmjTjs&ust=1745232420706000&source=images&cd=vfe&opi=89978449&ved=0CBQQjRxqFwoTCOiHodm35owDFQAAAAAdAAAAABAo
- Garcia, R., & Lee, H. (2020). Comparative analysis of ultrasonic and infrared sensors for waste level detection. Sensors and Actuators A: Physical, 310, 112046.
- Smith, A., & Chen, L. (2021). Low-power wide-area network architectures for urban IoT deployments. IEEE Internet of Things Journal, 8(4), 2550-2561.
- Kumar, S., Joshi, P., & Rao, V. (2021). Random forest-based waste classification using RGB imagery. Journal of Environmental Informatics, 37(2), 78-87.
- Zhang, Y., Wang, X., & Liu, J. (2021). MobileNet-based convolutional neural networks for real-time waste categorization. Journal of Visual Communication and Image Representation, 75, 103-112.
- Patel, K., & Rao, M. (2022). Economic assessment of smart waste collection systems in metropolitan areas. Waste Management, 130, 502-511.
- Lee, S., Park, J., & Kim, D. (2022). Field deployment of integrated ultrasonic and infrared sensing for smart bins. IEEE Transactions on Industrial Informatics, 18(1), 342-350.
- Garcia, R., Morales, L., & Singh, P. (2020). Calibration methodologies for ultrasonic sensors under temperature variations. Measurement Science and Technology, 31(8), 085902.
- Chen, Y., & Li, F. (2021). LoRaWAN network optimization for public service applications. International Journal of Distributed Sensor Networks, 17(6), 155014772110220.
- Jones, M., & Thompson, S. (2022). Edge computing in smart city applications: Opportunities and challenges. Future Generation Computer Systems, 125, 1-12.
- Nguyen, T., & Ho, Q. (2022). Model compression techniques for CNN deployment on edge devices. Journal of Parallel and Distributed Computing, 163, 30-45.
- Brown, D., & Green, S. (2021). Data augmentation strategies for improved image-based waste classification. Pattern Recognition Letters, 147, 197-204.
- Singh, R., & Verma, A. (2021). Path optimization in smart waste collection using Dijkstra’s algorithm. Computers & Operations Research, 134, 105410.
- Municipal Corporation of City X. (2021). Open data portal: Traffic and sanitation datasets. City X Open Data.
- TensorFlow Team. (2021). TensorFlow 2.4 documentation. Retrieved from https://www.tensorflow.org/versions/r2.4
- Jetson Nano Developer Guide. (2022). NVIDIA Corporation. Retrieved from https://developer.nvidia.com/embedded/jetson-nano
- LoRa Alliance. (2020). LoRaWAN™ specification v1.0.3. Retrieved from https://lora-alliance.org/resource-hub/lorawan-specification-v103
- World Bank. (2021). Municipal solid waste management in developing countries. World Bank Technical Report.
- Huang, K., & Tsai, Y. (2021). Impact of environmental humidity on ultrasonic sensor accuracy. IEEE Sensors Journal, 21(3), 3704-3712.
- Dijkstra, E. W. (1959). A note on two problems in connexion with graphs. Numerische Mathematik, 1, 269-271.
- European Environment Agency. (2022). Smart waste collection and resource efficiency. EEA Report No 19/2022.